Open Mic Wednesday 3/21/12
It’s Open Mic Wednesday. What’s on your mind?

Writer-Talk Tuesday: Let’s Talk POINT OF VIEW
As a reminder, I’m spending the next several Tuesdays sharing comments I’ve made on past writing contest entries as a judge. Today’s comments come from the Point of View sections.
Is the point of view consistent? Are POV changes smooth and logical?
So that I don’t have to try to repeat everything I’ve said about POV before:
Make POV Work for You–Introduction
Make POV Work for You: Dispelling a Few POV Myths
Make POV Work for You: POV Begins with Character
Make POV Work for You: I’m Ready for My Closeup
Make POV Work for You: Avoiding Head-Hopping
Make POV Work for You: The Unreliable Narrator
Make POV Work for You: Character Vocabulary
Make POV Work for You: Show Don’t Tell (Part 1)
Make POV Work for You: More on Character Description
Make POV Work for You: Show Don’t Tell (Part 2)
Make POV Work for You: Writing the Male POV
Suggested Reading
The Power of Point of View by Alicia Rasley
Characters and Viewpoint by Orson Scott Card
Characters, Emotion & Viewpoint by Nancy Kress
The most important thing I can tell you for trying to get a good score on Point of View sections is to know the standard POV structure/voice for the genre you’re entering. Most YA is currently first person or third-person limited. Fantasy/Sci-Fi is usually third person, either limited or omniscient (but NOT head-hopping—read more about that here). Romance is third person/limited/past-tense. And so on. Unlike editors and agents who might be looking for that breakout writer who breaks the genre molds, contest judges are judging based on the Platonic ideal of the genre (or, to use the five-letter word we don’t like using here, they’re making sure you’re following the “rules”).
Once again, here are some comments I’ve made on past contest judging sheets about POV:
Even in a short novel, viewpoint scenes need to be meaty and long enough to have a significant impact on the story. Switching viewpoint characters every few paragraphs—even with a scene-break indicator between—is as jarring to the reader as head hopping.
___________________________________________
The standard Point of View for historical romance is Limited 3rd Person. What that means is that each scene is seen/experienced through the eyes/ears of only one viewpoint character. That means no switching back and forth between characters, no omniscient narrator who’s telling the story and occasionally dipping into various characters’ heads at will. This type of narrative should be written almost as if in First Person—very deep inside the viewpoint character’s head. The author cannot intrude and tell information that the character doesn’t know or wouldn’t think about or doesn’t experience with his own five senses.
Only the characters who are stakeholders in the story—in other words, their internal journeys affect the direction, conflict, climax, and resolution of the story—should have scenes written in their viewpoint. In a romance novel, this is usually limited to the hero and heroine.
___________________________________________
In deep (limited) POV, you cannot write anything that your viewpoint character cannot see, hear, smell, taste, feel, or know for him/herself. If you’re in your heroine’s viewpoint and you write: “her face turned red,” you’ve head-hopped. Why? Because that description is coming from an external observer. She can’t see her own face turn red. She can only experience the burning sensation, feel the mortification deep-down inside her soul, wish the floor would open up and swallow her.
___________________________________________
You have a tendency to shift POV—not just outside of the viewpoint character’s head (see where I’ve marked “head-hop”) but between third-person and first-person and between past-tense and present-tense verbs.
___________________________________________
You have shown that you have a pretty good handle on writing in first-person POV. Just be cautious about turning around and directly addressing the reader and breaking into second-person POV (“you”).
___________________________________________
You have a tendency to step outside of your POV character. For example: “The two women hugged . . .” The way to make sure you’re staying in Deep 3rd POV is to think about how you would write it if you were writing in 1st person: I hugged my sister or we hugged, not we two women hugged. Therefore, Jan hugged her sister or they hugged. In Deep 3rd POV, you cannot show what the POV character doesn’t see for herself.
___________________________________________
The main character is very identifiable and has a unique “voice” all of her own. However, I could not, for the life of me, remember her name right after finishing reading the excerpt. I could remember Chris (26 occurrences), Lisa (12 occurrences), Suzanne/Suz (24 occurrences), and Ben (13 occurrences). But the name of the main character was never used enough to establish it in my memory, which is one of the problems with writing in first person POV. When I teach writing classes on Opening Chapters or on Character Development, a rule of thumb I give is that in a first chapter, the viewpoint character’s name should be mentioned at least twice on each page. That would mean that Daphne should appear between 18 and 20 times in this excerpt. Unfortunately, it only appears 5 times. Which means her name is mentioned less than half the number of times of the least-mentioned secondary character (Lisa). So see if you can find a way to establish your main character’s name by using it more often in dialogue—have Chris call her by name right in his first line to get things rolling (which will also play into the idea that this isn’t the first time he’s done this).
___________________________________________
What questions or concerns do you have about viewpoint/POV, especially when it comes to contests or critiques?
Book-Talk Monday: Reading *Popular* Fiction
The term “popular fiction” is occasionally used interchangeably with “genre fiction”—another term to describe books that fall into categories like romance, science fiction, fantasy, mystery, etc. In fact, my master’s degree is in Writing Popular Fiction, and my area of specialization was Romance.
But using popular to describe all genre fiction is a misnomer—because not every book published in genre fiction is going to be “popular,” i.e., “regarded with favor, approval, or affection by people in general.” Looking at my own sales numbers, Stand-In Groom is a much more “popular” book than A Case For Love—as it’s sold several thousand more copies.
As readers, the books we love don’t always find the spotlight of popular approval. They’re not the bestsellers, the books that get all the media attention, become major motion pictures. And for many of us, the books that are the most popular (those on the bestseller lists, for example) aren’t those that we enjoy—we just don’t “get” why these books are so popular.
I’m a stubborn person by nature and I rarely do something just because everyone else is doing it. That’s not to say I don’t get caught up in pop culture trends—like certain TV shows like LOST. However when it comes to books, the more often I’m told I should read something, the less likely I am to read it unless it’s something that greatly interests me. (I have to this day never read The Shack, even though I have a copy of it on my shelf. I’ve been told repeatedly I *should* or *need* to read it—but the concept of the book and the storyline itself doesn’t interest me at all, so I don’t see the point in reading it.) I’m also not the kind of person who runs out and reads a book just because there’s a movie coming out based on it. Sometimes, the investment of two hours is all I need to know whether or not I’m going to like a story. (Such as with The Help. Now that I’ve seen the movie, I have no desire to read the book.)
However, there are times when something becomes so popular, gains such a following, that I decide out of curiosity to check it out to see what the hubbub is. This happened many years ago when the sixth Harry Potter book came out. All the outcries against the series started up again in the Christian writers’ group I was in—from people who’d never read the books, just read about them on conservative blogs or heard about them from preachers or speakers who were against them. That’s not to discount their stances or beliefs on the books. But I have never allowed others to form my opinions for me. So before I took a stance one way or the other on the books/films, I decided I needed to find out what they were about. So I got the discs of the first three movies from Netflix (they all actually arrived on the same day) and spent a Saturday watching them. Before the third movie ended, I’d gotten online and ordered a set of the first five books in paperback, as well as the hardcover of the sixth book (it wasn’t out in paperback yet), and within less than two months, I’d read the entire series and was eagerly anticipating the release of the seventh book. Which wouldn’t happen for a couple of years.
There have been other times when I’ve picked up a book to read because I’d heard a lot about it, because it was popular. But most of the time, I’ve discovered that my tastes don’t necessarily run to what’s “popular,” not even within the romance genre. I’m just a picky reader.
This weekend, I decided that I needed to once again get in touch with popular culture and read The Hunger Games. I started with downloading the sample to my Kindle. When on that page on Amazon, I discovered that it’s a title that’s part of Amazon’s free lending program. But I still wanted to read the sample first. I did—and as soon as I got to the end of the sample, I downloaded the entire book. That was around 9 p.m. Saturday night. At 5 p.m. Sunday afternoon, I finished reading the book. And I could see what all the hype was about—and I’m now wanting to see the movie, too.
Have you ever read something because it’s “popular,” even if it’s not something you might normally pick up? What’s been your experience in reading “popular” fiction?
Open Mic Wednesday 3/14/12
It’s Open Mic Wednesday. What’s on your mind?

Writer-Talk Tuesday: Let’s Talk STORY
Two weeks ago, I posted some of the comments I’ve made as a writing-contest judge in the areas of Characterization, Conflict, and Dialogue. I wasn’t able to get to the area of STORY . . . simply because “story” covers so much ground. So for the next few Writer-Talk Tuesdays, I’ll break that element down into chunks and share some of my favorite comments from past contests. (The headings these are broken into are from the score sheet from the ACFW Genesis contest.)
Does the story hold your interest to the end of the entry?
This is where a lot of judges will knock off points subjectively. Because, let’s face it, this is a very subjective question. This is where both how you start your entry and where you end your entry come into play.
First, obviously, you need a great opening hook. You want to grab the reader (in this case, the contest judge) right off the bat. Since receiving my Kindle a year ago, I’ve read a lot of sample opening chapters—mostly of Christian fiction, but of some general-market fiction as well. If I read all the way through to the end of the sample, it’s one that’s going on my wishlist—or possibly, if I have disposable income and/or it’s got a really low sale price, I’ll go ahead and purchase/download the whole book. That’s how important your opening pages are: will it make the reader (the editor, agent, or customer) pull the trigger and buy your book?
You also want to leave your reader (judge) wanting more when they get to the end of the entry—you want them wishing that they had just one more page, just one more chapter, because they need to know what happens next. Even if there are technical/craft issues with your entry, if you leave the reader wanting more story, they’re going to give you a higher score.
So you need several key things to score well on this:
• Strong opening hook
• Strong, interesting characters
• Interesting setting/scenario
• Unique premise
• End with a hook
Here are some recent comments I’ve made on entries under this question:
Suggested Reading:
Make a Scene: Crafting a Powerful Story One Scene at a Time by Jordan E. Rosenfeld
The Power of Point of View by Alicia Rasley
Characters and Viewpoint by Orson Scott Card
Scene and Structure by Jack Bickham
Setting by Jack Bickham
Writing the Breakout Novel by Donald Maass
Stein on Writing by Sol Stein
Writing the Christian Romance by Gail Martin
______________________________________
In this blog post, James Scott Bell wrote the following:
- There were several items that should be avoided at all costs on the first page. Here they are, in no particular order:
Exposition Dump
In most of the first pages I reviewed there was entirely too much exposition. The author thinks that this is information the reader has to know in order to understand the character and the scene.
In truth, readers need to know very little to get into the story. They will wait a long time for explanations and backstory if the action is gripping, essential, tense or disturbing. My rule, ever since I began writing and teaching, is act first, explain later.
This rule will serve you amazingly well your entire writing career.
______________________________________
The scenes are static—mostly descriptions/summaries of actions, not the actions themselves—and they lack purpose and direction.
______________________________________
Because of the amount of telling of backstory in this section, I had a hard time wanting to keep reading. Any time you have to use transitions such as three months later or they stayed for six days in your first chapter, it’s an indicator you’ve started your story in the wrong place. Plus, long paragraphs of narrative that tell about the passing of time, that tell about what’s going on around the character, or that tell about emotional events that impact the character after the fact (without having shown the active scene in which the events occurred), aren’t going to draw readers in and keep them interested in what’s going on in your story. You have a way with words—I’d love to see that put to much better use in active, showing, impactful scenes instead of scenes full of long paragraphs of telling.
______________________________________
While your prose is well crafted, nothing happens in these fifteen pages to make me, as a reader, interested enough to want to know more about these characters (and even after reading your synopsis, which I waited to do until after reading the fifteen pages, I still wasn’t hooked). In fact, I’m more interested in [a secondary character’s] story than [the heroine’s].
______________________________________
Story begins with character. To draw a reader into your story, you must create compelling characters that draw the reader into the emotional and visceral experience of the world you’re crafting. Characters must have depth of emotion. Not melodrama, but there must be something deeper than just the surface-level presented here. A couple of really good books you should study to help you in this aspect are Getting into Character by Brandilyn Collins and The Plot Thickens by Noah Lukeman—because in addition to compelling characters, a story that’s going to hold a reader’s interest is going to start with compelling plot as well. The most interesting thing that happened in your entry happened on the last two or three pages. An editor isn’t going to give you that long to draw them into the story.
______________________________________
You need to get your characters into the scene as soon as possible. And be sure the reader knows who your characters are. Make it clear whose viewpoint we’re in. Establish a purpose, a goal, or an intention for the character. Jordan Rosenfeld in Make a Scene calls this the scene intention:
- Give [your character] an intention in every scene—a job that he wants to carry out that will give purpose to the scene. The intention doesn’t come from nowhere—it stems directly from the significant situation of your plot and from your protagonist’s personal history. An intention is a character’s plan to take an action, to do something, whereas a motivation is a series of reasons, from your character’s personal history to his mood, that accounts for why he plans to take an action.
Questions to ask yourself for each scene—but especially opening scenes/chapters:
• What are the most immediate desires of your character?
• Will your character meet his intention or meet with opposition?
• Does the scene intention make sense to the overall plot of your story?
• Who will help your characters achieve the intention—or thwart it?
Scene intentions need to involve conflict and they need to tie into the plot or one of the subplots of the story. You need to know your character’s intentions from the beginning of the scene so you know whether they are supposed to reach them or not.
Action doesn’t need setup.
The sooner you start the action in a scene, the more momentum it has to carry the reader forward. If you find yourself explaining an action, they you don’t have action anymore—you have narrative.
You need physical movement and a sense of time passing—and the lack of an explanation as to why something is happening is what keeps a reader reading.
Get straight to the action. If a character is going to jump off a cliff, open with him stepping off the edge, not standing there contemplating it for five paragraphs.
Hook the reader with big or surprising actions. An outburst, a car crash, a heart attack, a public argument, a knock at the door. But this big, surprising action must be relevant to the main plot of the novel. Don’t invent a “bang” just for the sake of opening with a “bang.”
Be sure the action is true to your character. Don’t open a scene with a shy/quiet character going off on someone. That’s something to build up to at the end of a scene much further into the book. Do open with a difficult boss berating that shy/quiet character.
Act first, think later. If the character needs to react to something or have a (brief) moment of introspection, have her do something active first.
______________________________________
Any questions about any of those comments?
Book-Talk Monday: Fiction vs. Nonfiction
What’s the ratio of fiction vs. nonfiction that you read?
And I’m not talking about devotionals or Bible study books. I’m talking biographies, memoirs, histories, essay collections, etc. And reading, not just books for research. A nonfiction book you choose to read versus one you have to read for a school paper or for what you’re writing.
Last month, I read the novel The Lady Elizabeth by Alison Weir, who, I learned, is better known for her nonfiction histories of eminent personages from the Tudor era (mainly) along with other historical British personalities. Since one of my major gripes with the novel was that it was apparent she was more accustomed to writing nonfiction (way too many info dumps/too much unnecessary historical context given throughout), I decided to read her nonfiction account of Elizabeth’s mother, The Lady in the Tower: The Fall of Anne Boleyn. The same “wait, let me backtrack and tell you all the details leading up to this event” tendency is there, but in a nonfiction piece, for me it’s not only acceptable, but I appreciate it.
I don’t read a lot of nonfiction by choice. I do enjoy research when it’s for a project (I’m the person who, in college, wrote a research paper on a historical figure I was interested in just because I wanted to—properly annotated and everything—and no one else has ever read it!), but to just sit down and read something nonfiction isn’t really something I do. There are some nonfiction books I’ve enjoyed—many of which are memoirs/personal accounts of public figures or celebrities I’ve liked (I’ve read Bill and Hillary Clintons’ books, Barack Obama’s books, biographies of Katharine Hepburn and Cary Grant, the psuedo-autobiography of the Judds, and a couple of Frank Schaeffer’s most recent books). I have a huge number of books on the Civil War—but the only ones I’ve actually read cover to cover are the ones I had to read for my college classes.
On the flip side, I enjoy watching documentaries: Rome: Engineering an Empire, Queen Victoria’s Empire, The Civil War, Ken Burn’s The West, The National Parks, and so on. When I had cable TV, more often than not, when there was nothing else on, I might find the TV parked on H2 (formerly History International) on something like The Dark Ages or America: The Story of Us or Life After People. But just don’t ask me to sit down and read 400 pages on those topics!
So I’d have to say that my fiction to nonfiction ratio (not counting research books, remember) is at least 100:1 (100 fiction books to every 1 nonfiction book). My reading goal for this year is to read at least thirty-six new-to-me books, and I’m going to alter that goal to include at least two nonfiction books read for pleasure, not research.
What about you?
Fun Friday–TGIF!

Not for nothing is their motto TGIF – ‘Thank God it’s Friday.’ They live for weekends when they can go do what they really want to do.
~ Richard Nelson Bolles
.
The rhythm of the weekend, with its birth, its planned gaiety, and its announced end, followed the rhythm of life and was a substitute for it.
~F. Scott Fitzgerald
.
There aren’t enough days in the weekend.
~Rod Schmidt
.
Weekends don’t count unless you spend them doing something completely pointless.
~ Bill Waterson
.
Weekends are a bit like rainbows; they look good from a distance but disappear when you get up close to them.
~John Shirley
.
Make each day of the week like Friday and your life will take on new enthusiasm.
~Byron Pulsifer
.
Only Robinson Crusoe had everything done by Friday.
~Thank Goodness It’s Friday
Thursday Thought Provoker
Writer-Talk Wednesday: March 2012 Writing Update
If anyone’s been watching the word-count widget over in the right-hand column, you’ll have noticed that I haven’t made much progress since my last writing update post four weeks ago. (Fewer than 5,000 words written in February.) I stated last month that my goal was to have the first draft of Follow the Heart finished by mid-March. Obviously, that’s not going to happen. However, my goal is still to have the draft finished in time so that I have a couple of weeks for the rewrites/revisions/additions I know the first part of the draft needs.
So what does that mean?
Well, that means if I can write 1,000 words a day, I can reach that 80,000 to 90,000-word goal by April 16, which would give me two weeks for revisions/rewrites/additions/edits before I turn it in. That’s a pretty tight turnaround!
If I can write 1,200 words a day, I can be finished by April 8, which gives me a little more breathing room.
However, if I can write 1,500 words a day, I can be finished by April 1, which gives me a month to really work on crafting those additional scenes I need, rounding out the ones I have, revising the ones that feel forced or dry . . . and then still be able to go back for a final pass for editing before I turn it in on May 1.
In the 1k1hr challenges I did in January and February, I always wrote between 1,200 and 1,600 words. So that’s my goal. Do a 1k1hr challenge every day and try to average between 1,200 and 1,500 words a day so that I can get this first draft finished and get on to what I consider more fun—polishing everything and making it sing!
How have you done with your writing (novel, short stories, articles, devotionals, school papers, blogging) in the past month? Share your successes/challenges!
Book-Talk Monday: What Are You Reading (March 2012)
It’s the first Monday of the month, so it’s time to share what we’re reading!
.
- What is the most recent book you’ve finished reading? (Please tell us a little about it, and whether or not you enjoyed/would recommend it.)
Since February’s update, I finished reading (click the title for my “review”):
–A Tailor-Made Bride by Karen Witemeyer
–A Kiss at Midnight by Eloisa James (audio book)
–The Lady Elizabeth by Alison Weir
–Dracula by Bram Stoker (audio book)
–Waterfall by Lisa T. Bergren
- What are you currently reading?
Currently reading: I’m not allowing myself to start reading anything new until I get the first draft of Follow the Heart finished. Reading will be my treat for finishing.
Currently listening to: Christy by Catherine Marshall (read by Kellie Martin)
- What’s the next book on your To Be Read stack?
Follow the Heart, Book 1 of the Great Exhibition series by Kaye Dacus—I must finish this manuscript so that I have time for rewrites, revisions, and edits before I have to turn it in on May 1!









