Skip to content

Networking–What is it, really?

Monday, July 31, 2006

Think about the last time you went to a social event, whether it was an after-work casual gathering, a black-tie awards dinner, the all-church picnic, or even a small dinner party at someone’s home. How do you interact with the people there? Are there certain people you make a point of speaking to? Do you go in with an agenda listing to whom you will speak and about what topics? Most of us would say yes, there are certain people we want to make a point of speaking to. For having an agenda, if it is truly just a social gathering, most of us would say no.

For those you make a point to speak to, is it because you’re wanting to catch up with them or find out about something that’s going on in their lives? Or is it because you want them to know you better? If we’re really honest with ourselves, many times the people we seek out to speak to are those we would like to know better and, through making a point of speaking with them about their concerns and activities, we are hoping to get them interested enough in us to ask our concerns and activities. Right?

This is networking. You never know whom you might run into who might have an opportunity or a connection to share with you. That’s not saying we want to exploit every relationship or contact we make for our own gain—by no means. I’m just saying that by cultivating relationships with others, we never know what might come our way—whether it’s an opportunity to serve or help that other person, or an opportunity that might be in some way beneficial to us.

Granted, in a social setting, networking is quite different than it is in a business setting. So what’s the best way to go about making “networking contacts” in a business environment—such as at a writing conference?

As I mentioned before, one of the best ways I found of doing it was to be actively involved in the leadership of the organization. Granted, not everyone can do this, as not everyone is comfortable in or skilled for leadership positions. At a conference such as ACFW, there is the built-in method of the Editor/Agent appointments where those who sign up for them get 15 minutes one-on-one with the editor/agent (hopefully) of their choice. Then there are the hosted tables at meal times. While these can be nerve-wracking for those of us introverts who have a really hard time meeting others, it is important to learn how to put yourself forward, hold out your hand, and introduce yourself. It is important to be polite and let others have their equal share of the attention, but if you do not put yourself forward, you will be overshadowed by the more outgoing people at the table.

Do not be afraid to approach someone—be it a published author you admire or an editor/agent with whom you would like to work—and ask a question about something they may have said in the panel discussion or in a class or over a meal. (Just don’t follow them into the bathroom to do so!)

Outside of a structured business environment like a conference, always be on the lookout for opportunities to make contacts with people in your chosen field. Writers: go to book signings to mingle in the crowd and potentially meet the author and/or representatives from publishing houses. When the Zondervan parade—book signing tour, I mean—came to Nashville a couple of years ago with Brandilyn Collins, Terri Blackstock, James Scott Bell, and Bill Myers, I had the opportunity to speak with an editor who was there from Thomas Nelson. I had sat at her table at the ACFW conference several months before and she’d asked me if I would review a manuscript for her. I had given her my card at the conference, but then never heard back from her. When I saw her at the book signing, I approached her and re-introduced myself (she recognized me but I didn’t want to put her on the spot if she didn’t remember my name) and gave her another card. Within a week, I had a copy of the manuscript. While that did not parlay into a freelance opportunity, it was still an important contact, because it got my name in front of two or three editors whom I subsequently had contact with over the manuscript. (And I got to read Laura Jensen Walker’s Dreaming in Black and White about six months before street date!)

I guess the three most important things I can say about networking are:

1. Don’t be shy. Practice speaking to strangers—the cashier or other customers in line at the grocery store, people sitting near you in the airport or doctor’s waiting room, others working out at the gym, your neighbors, other parents at your kid’s soccer game, people outside of your “comfort zone” at church, and so on. And don’t let others push you out of the spotlight when it’s your turn to shine. Speak up!

2. It’s not all about you. Learn to be an active listener. This may mean asking a published author how he or she first started writing or what inspires him/her. It may mean asking an editor/agent what the best book they’ve read in the last six months is. Editors and agents especially constantly hear, “I, me, my, mine,” from the people they talk to—and that can start to blend into one monotonous drone. But if they have a unique conversation to connect with the memory of your name/face, you are more likely to be remembered when your manuscript crosses their desks.

3. Don’t be an attention hog. While you don’t want anyone to steal your limelight, you don’t want to infringe upon someone else’s time. Don’t monopolize the editor/agent at the dinner table. Give the other eight people at the table time to talk. Don’t stalk them whenever you see them and hound them with attempts at unique conversations to make them remember you. They’ll remember you, all right, and not in a good way! At a book signing, be aware of the people in line behind you—they all want their time, too. Limit your conversation to no more than 60-seconds if anyone is standing in line behind you. If you really want to have a more in-depth conversation with them, ask them if they have a few moments after the signing to speak with you, that you have some questions you’d like to ask.

Now, go out this week and find at least one opportunity to at least practice networking. And leave me a comment when you do—I’d like to know how it goes!

Gas–$3, Book–$12, Networking–Priceless

Saturday, July 29, 2006

Over the past year or so, I have become a huge proponent of networking, especially after my experience last year with being in charge of overseeing the ACFW contests for unpublished and published authors and getting to know several key editors and agents in the CBA marketplace, several of whom told me to go ahead and submit my work to them whenever I was ready without even knowing what it was, just because we had worked together on the contests. (Have I done this yet? No, but that’s a different post!)

I’ve written on this blog before about the opportunity I took of networking with editors from Salem Publishing that led to my current freelance work. Because I was anxious to find a new job, I’d sent out by mail and e-mail resumes to all of the different publishing companies in town. The editor from Salem contacted me within an hour of receiving my e-mail and asked me to come in to talk to him even though he didn’t have any open positions at the time. I could have said no, I was only interested in full-time employment, but I saw it as a networking opportunity. Most publications are constantly on the lookout for people to do freelance work, whether writing or editing, so I knew I couldn’t pass it up. One thing led to another in that conversation, including my mentioning that I loved to listen to Southern Gospel music, which led to my very first publication in June (two CD reviews) and followed up with a cover story article in the August 2006 edition of Singing News magazine.

When perusing the information on the Alumni retreat that was going on the weekend that I graduated from Seton Hill, I recognized the name of a CBA agent who was going to be speaking to the alumni, Joyce Hart of the Hartline Agency. One day at lunch, when I happened to see her sitting alone at a table in the cafeteria, I took the chance of stopping to speak to her. She recognized me and asked me about what I was working on, and we had a pleasant chat for about two or three minutes. She didn’t ask me to submit and I didn’t “pitch” to her, but it was a chance to get my name/face in front of her once again (especially important since I’m only going to the book signing and awards banquet at this year’s ACFW National Conference, so won’t really get a chance to see too many editors/agents to network with).

Today, I had another opportunity for networking thrown my way. I went down to Barnes & Noble to see if they had any copies of the magazine that I could pick up and there, just inside the front door, was a former coworker, Pat Embry, signing his new book Where The Locals Eat: Nashville. Although our conversation centered around what we’d each been doing since leaving The Tennessean, it was also a great connection for me with someone else in the publishing industry. The only bad part of it is that I had no business cards with me! (I’ve got to get a little card carrier and start taking those with me everywhere.)

How do you network? How do you find/take advantage of those opportunities? What’s your best or—gasp!—worst networking experience?

The Codes of Romance

Thursday, July 27, 2006

In their essay, “Beneath the Surface: The Hidden Codes of Romance,” best-selling romance novelists Linda Barlow and Jayne Ann Krentz* relate the relationship between author and reader to a nearly contractual agreement. When a reader picks up a romance novel, she comes to it with certain subconscious expectations in mind as to the development of the characters and their relationship, the plot, and the ultimate ending. When an author fails to follow through on meeting these expectations, the romance reader feels let down, betrayed even. It is this “code” which creates such antipathy for romance novels in the general public while keeping readers returning again and again to buy more books. Barlow and Krentz take this one step further to point out that it is not just the structure of the stories that carry expectations, but the language—the “diction”—of the genre that draw the reader in. They believe romance readers are trained through their reading to recognize turns of phrase or word constructs and respond with a deep emotional connection to the story and the characters. In fact, they posit, the reader looks for these constructs, wanting to relive these emotions with each book they read. They also expect character development and the relationship between hero and heroine to be the main focus of the story, and through the use of “descriptive code,” they expect a detailed description of the characters’ physical characteristics.

The irony of the situation is that these same readers who are looking for the familiar codes of the romance genre don’t want to read the same basic story over and over. They may be drawn to certain types of stories (pirates, captured by Indians, marriage of convenience/mail-order-bride, etc.) but they want each story to be fresh and unique.

As an avid reader of romance myself, when it came to writing Stand-In Groom, I used the structure expected in a romance novel: Anne and George meet in the first chapter and are “interested” in each other. An attraction develops on each side but is hindered by the use of a Shakespearean hidden identity plot in which Anne believes George is a groom for whom she is planning a wedding. When George’s true identity is revealed, there is an initial admitting of feelings for each other and a brief time of happiness. However, in a romance novel, the relationship cannot be so easily won. Therefore, a major obstacle must break them up, seemingly forever, which in this case is Anne’s believing George has lied and is using her for his own ends, making her turn down his proposal of marriage and tell him she never wants to see him again. The romance reader expects this breakup of the relationship, wanting to see once again that true love conquers all. What must be conquered in Stand-In Groom is Anne’s greatest fear when she has to decide whether her immobilizing terror of flying is worth facing to follow George and convince him to come back to her. The novel ends with the anticipated happy ending, as every romance novel should.

However, it is not just in story structure that I followed the conventions of the genre. I also incorporated the subconsciously sought-after turns of phrase to connect the reader with my story as well as connect my story with the genre; for example, when Anne first meets George, she gazes “into eyes the color of light-roast cinnamon hazelnut coffee, and her heart fluttered.” George appreciates Anne’s “shapely figure” and “Wedgwood-blue eyes.” Throughout the novel, eyes sparkle, pulses race, hearts thunder, toes curl, and cheeks burn (which is as far as the physical sensuality goes, of course). These are all “coded” phrases that bring to the reader a sense of familiarity—that wonderful, familiar tingle or twitter in the tummy because they are signposts, whether the reader recognizes them or not, that grow and develop the romance between the lead characters.

The idea of “coded” language or plot structure isn’t unique to romance—it’s something that appears in almost all genre language. Think about Mystery novels. There are certain buried/hidden codes within the language that give readers subconscious hints and clues. Science Fiction is replete with these types of codes. Even though the worlds of SciFi are extremely diverse, there is a certain language that all SciFi readers expect to find, a certain turn-of-phrase, a certain way of describing things, a certain focus on the technical aspects of how things work.

This is where the study of the particular genre one writes in becomes not just fascinating, but important. There are reasons why we each enjoy reading certain genres more than others, and a major portion of that is the familiarity of the “language” of the genre. In my program, I learned how to break down published inspirational romance novels for what worked and what didn’t and slowly realized that those who knew the “codes” inside-out and then added their own unique twist and voice to them tended to be more successful and have better-written, more enjoyable stories.

Coded language is one of the reasons why “formula” or Category Romance remains so popular to this day, and the authors who are the best at it know and understand how to incorporate the codes without letting that be all there is to their story.

*Barlow, Linda and Jayne Ann Krentz. “Beneath the Surface: The Hidden Codes of Romance.” Dangerous Men and Adventurous Women: Romance Writers on the Appeal of the Romance. Ed. Jayne Ann Krentz. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 1992. 15–29

Writing Marathon Results . . . And Thoughts on Drafts

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

This past weekend, I managed to write over 5,800 words–most of them on my current Work In Progress, Ransome’s Honor. The new material has not, however, been posted, as it is very rough and needs a thorough going-over before I put it up for public consumption. Which may be a while, because I’m trying to keep pressing forward to get as much of it written as I can before I start going back for rewrites.

When I started working with critique partners about three years ago, a paradigm shift happened in my writing. Rather than just writing and pressing forward and making notes to myself of things that would need to change in a future draft, I started going back and rewriting/revising chapters as I wrote them, thus impeding my progress. Hindsight being what it is, I know this is why it took me so long to write Happy Endings Inc. when I’d completed drafts of three other novels in the two years prior to starting HEI.

Now, I have so many people who have been reading Ransome’s Honor that I feel I have to put polished chapters up for them to read. I’m already in my third version of the beginning of the novel (1st version was for a stand-alone single title, 2nd version was as a trilogy but with the first half of the first book being when Julia and William were children), and I now feel like I’m making some headway with it. I’ve fallen back on a couple of old “crutches” I used to use back when I just wanted to get the story down and not worry about polishing until later–blank lines and info dumps.

Blank Lines: Whenever I don’t want to stop to think up a name for a minor character or place of business, when I need to look something up, or when a word just isn’t coming to me, rather than stop writing, I put in a ________________ and highlight it in yellow, which will draw my attention to it when I go back for revisions.

Info Dumps: Whenever I’ve got a lot of information–whether a character’s background (i.e., their personal history with another character, where they come from, and so on) or historical information or setting information, I’ll just go ahead and “dump” it into the exposition with the understanding that when I rewrite, I’ll have to figure out a way to weave it into the narrative so it isn’t just a dumpsite.

I believe if I continue allowing myself to write a FIRST DRAFT instead of trying to write a FINISHED PRODUCT the first time out, I’ll find it much easier to get the story written and then I’ll have much more fun in the revision process because I didn’t beat myself up about it the first time through!

Writing Marathon–Day 1/2 continued

Friday, July 21, 2006

Okay, so much for the “no distractions” part of the evening. I arrived home from work at the beginning of the storm that was the same system that hit St. Louis a couple of days ago. Which meant NO ELECTRICITY. But, I sat on the front porch with my laptop computer—I was going to review the chapter I finished this afternoon and then get down to the serious business of writing.

After TEN MINUTES the laptop’s battery died. I didn’t even get to page 5 in reading the last chapter!

So, I went to a movie instead. I went to see M. Night Shyamalan’s Lady In The Water—wow! What a fabulous movie. And now I’m home, so I’m going to grab a quick bite to eat and then get down to the business of W-R-I-T-I-N-G.

Oh, and one more thing . . . I got the August issue of Singing News magazine in the mail today—and the cover story was written by ME! Yep, that’s right. My cover story article is in the August issue of the magazine.

Writing Marathon Weekend — Day 1/2

Friday, July 21, 2006

Today is the first day of the MTCW Writing Marathon Weekend. All week, I’ve been gearing up for this by getting some research done (reading books like Tea With Jane Austen, Jane Austen: The World of Her Novels, and Life in Regency England). Because it was a slow day at work (all I had to do was finish typing some dessert recipes for a dessert cookbook we’re putting together), I was able to spend some time writing, and after a month or more of no progress, I wrote an entire chapter today–3,592 words!

I’m beginning to believe there is something to be said about writing in an office environment away from the distractions of home–the kitchen, the DVD collection, the laundry, food, too many other documents on the computer to lose myself in.

So, the goal for the rest of the weekend is to try to ignore as many distractions as possible–Keeping the TV turned off. I’ve already washed the necessary laundry to get me through the week and into Monday or Tuesday. I went to the grocery store last night, and while I will have to cook my meals throughout the weekend, I did pick up a few things that can be prepared quickly (and they’re healthy, too!). I’ve even figured out a way to save time on Sunday–the church I planned on visiting this week broadcasts their entire worship service on a local TV station! So no time “wasted” in doing my hair, putting on makeup, driving to and fro, etc!

When We ALL Get to Heaven

Saturday, July 15, 2006

Last month, I had the blessing of interviewing the Southern Gospel group LEGACY FIVE for an article for Singing News magazine. Legacy Five was started by two former members of the Cathedral Quartet and both credit founding Cathedrals members George Younce and Glen Payne with the legacy of music handed to them.

This afternoon, I tuned in to the regular Saturday evening broadcast of the Gaither Gospel Hour on the network-formerly-known-as-PAX. The program is a tribute to many of the legends of Southern Gospel Music who have already gone on to heaven—George Younce (no other bass will ever live up—or down—to him!), Glen Payne, Jake Hess (oh, how we miss that wig!), Hovie Lister, Howard and Vestal (waving my hankie!) Goodman, and so many more. While each tribute brought a tear to my eye and a lump to my throat, all I could think about was how wonderful it will be when we ALL get to heaven . . . Bill Gaither will finally have his ultimate HOMECOMING choir!

With the quality of music these legends were able to make here on this earth, I can only imagine what they are able to do now that they have entered the presence of Jesus, released from the pain and limitations of their earthly bodies. I so look forward to the time I can join them and sing:

There’s within my heart a melody;
Jesus whispers sweet and low,
“Fear not, I am with thee, peace, be still,”
In all of life’s ebb and flow.

Jesus, Jesus, Jesus,
Sweetest name I know,
Fills my ev’ry longing,
Keeps me singing as I go.

Secondary Characters

Friday, July 14, 2006

Okay, so far with our discussion of the craft of romance writing, we’ve discussed beginnings and the promise that we set up for our readers with the first few chapters of our novels, and we’ve discussed how our Heroes/Heroines meet and the importance of making the Meet distinctive and memorable.

Now, let’s discuss two very important minor characters. Most romances have them (you just may not recognize them), and they can be vitally important to your story in many ways.

Here are the definitions from Billy Mernit’s Writing The Romantic Comedy (from Chapter 4):

The Bellamy: This is “the Other Man or Woman, the Wrong Guy or Girl. In the screwball era, Ralph Bellamy was the prime rejected suitor of choice, playing the earnest, stodgy fellow who didn’t get the joke or the girl. Presentable enough in terms of social status, he was neither deep in temperment nor desirable in appearance, and he was usually saddled with a profession that screamed boredom.” (Think of Bill Pullman’s character in Sleepless in Seattle or Greg Kinnear in You’ve Got Mail.) “Solid and dependable, Bellamy represents the qualities his heroines have been unable to secure in their desired heroines. . . . But at the same time, Bellamy’s personality is no match for his female’s lead. . . . The Bellamy has a dual function: while presenting a conceivable alternative to the romantic [lead] (and thus becoming an obstacle to the central romance) this supporting character helps define who the protagonist is and isn’t.” He is “the epitome of ‘settling.'”

A Bellamy can also be a woman playing off the hero as he learns what he is really looking for in a woman.

The Buddy: “The best friend of your leading man/woman acts as a kind of characterization mirror.” Going back to the example of Sleepless in Seattle, think of Rosie O’Donnell and Rob Reiner. These two characters serve as “confidants who reflect their chums’ respective concerns and issues, defining and assessing them.”

Buddies help deliver exposition, help move the story forward, look out for the hero/heroine’s best interests, can seriously gum up the works, can propel the hero/heroine toward each other, and, most importantly, can nudge the hero/heroine toward “self-awareness.”

There are dangers in using both of these characters, however, the primary one being familiarity/stereotype. Think about every romantic comedy movie you’ve ever watched and you can pick out these characters. I named two Bellamys from two different Meg Ryan/Tom Hanks movies — how different was the Bill Pullman/Greg Kinnear role in each? How similar?

The Bellamy and the Buddy both should have a “specific role in the plot’s development.” They need to have a good reason to exist.

In shorter novels, you can double-up these roles in one character. Mernit points out the character of Fiona in Four Weddings and a Funeral — Fiona is a long-time friend of Charles (Hugh Grant), and yet when at the wedding of the woman he’s in love with, Fiona admits her feelings for Charles — fulfilling the role of both Buddy and Bellamy.

In Happy Endings Inc., I have used the Buddy characters for both hero and heroine — both of whom happen to be my heroine’s cousins. I also have a minor Bellamy.

Meredith serves as Buddy for the heroine Anne. She is Anne’s voice of reason when Anne’s emotions are too overwhelming. She is Anne’s sounding board when Anne needs someone to talk to. And she is the one who points out Anne’s need to resolve issues from her past before she can go on with her relationship with the hero.

Forbes serves as Buddy for the hero George. Aside from being one of George’s only friends in this new city, Forbes, in a somewhat manipulative way, arranges the development of Anne and George’s relationship. He also serves as Buddy for Anne, because it is he, in the end, who propels her toward the resolution of the conflict that has separated her from George.

My Bellamy is relatively minor (in this novel, anyway . . . he gets his own chance at love in the sequel). Major O’Hara is a friend from her past who has harbored long-time feelings for her, yet never acted upon them. When Anne believes George is unattainable and then later that he has lied to her, she turns to Major thinking she could possibly make a relationship between the two of them work. Major, however, sees she is in love with someone else and switches from Bellamy to Buddy by turning Anne back toward George.

Who are your characters’ Buddies and/or Bellamys?

The MEET

Friday, July 14, 2006

In Writing the Romantic Comedy (HarperResource, 2000, excerpted from Chapter 2), Billy Mernit breaks down the basic romance plot into three acts:
1. The MEET: Girl and boy have significant encounters.
2. The LOSE: Girl and boy are separated.
3. The GET: Girl and boy reunite.

Let’s talk about the MEET.

Mernit writes:
The Cute Meet: Catalyst–the inciting incident that brings man and woman together and into conflict; an inventive but credible contrivance . . . which in some way sets the tone for the action to come. . . . It’s somehow charged with significance, which, if you think about it, makes perfect sense. When you meet a couple in real life who’ve obviously got something good going on, how they met is an inevitable question, and more often than not, there’s an interesting answer.

. . .Often, a future couple has met (meaning they know each other) before the [meet] occurs. So the significant encounter and catalyst for the plot is a meeting in the metaphorical sense; it’s when they “really meet” . . . it is special, and it has a memorable, distinctive quality.

What “memorable, distinctive quality” does the first meet of your hero and heroine have that will make it stand out from all of the other manuscripts sitting on your prospective editor’s desk?

In my contemporary romance, I have two “meets” for my hero/heroine. The first is their actual first encounter when they are introduced in a restaurant by her cousin. The second is a few days later when George comes to Anne’s office pretending to be a groom for whom she will be planning a wedding. The reader knows the truth, but poor Anne must suffer through falling ever more in love with a man she thinks is marrying someone else. George must suffer through not being able to tell her the truth–and admit his growing feelings for her–because of the confidentiality contract he’s signed.

In my historical romance, the hero and herone met as children. As adults, Captain William Ransome has sworn he will never let a woman aboard his ship (metaphor for his heart) and Julia has harbored resentment toward William since she was 15 years old, as she felt her father (the admiral) let William replace her brother in his heart after her brother was lost at sea. They are suddenly thrown into each other’s company with no forewarning–and will continue to be so, as everyone around them (except her mother) contrives to push them together.

Novel Beginnings

Friday, July 14, 2006

In one of her books on craft, Beginnings, Middles & Ends, Nancy Kress wrote:

Every story makes a promise to the reader. Actually, two promises, one emotional and one intellectual, since the function of stories is to make us both think and feel. . . . Thus, a romance promises to entertain and titillate us, to confirm our belief that “love can conquer all,” and to transport us to a more glamorous world than this one, where the heroine (and by vicarious identification, the reader) is beautiful, well-dressed, and ultimately beloved. . . . As a writer, you must know what promise your story or novel makes. Your reader will know. She may buy your book because it belongs to a genre that promises certain things . . . or she may come to your story without preconceptions, in which case she’ll form them pretty quickly from your characters, tone, plot, and style. . . . By the time she’s read your opening, your reader knows what you’ve implicitly promised. (Writers Digest Books, 1993, pp 7-8)

Looking at the first chapter of your novel, what are you promising your reader?

For example:
In my historical romance, I promise my reader non-stereotypical characters, an in-depth journey into Regency England and the Napoleonic Royal Navy, humorous repartee between the characters, and a wait-’til-you-see-what-happens-next “ride” as my two strong-willed characters run head-long into each other, both seeming to stand in the way of the other achieving his/her goal.