Now What?
Now that A Case for Love is all squared away and turned in, what’s next? Take a break? Um . . . not really.
In case you haven’t noticed, I took the word-count widget for A Case for Love off yesterday, and I reset the counter for Ransome’s Crossing to zero. That’s not because I’ve trashed the bits and bobs of scenes I’ve written that may (or may not) be used in it. It means that I now need to start at the beginning writing it. And that means that starting next Monday, July 6 (the day I’m driving to Atlanta, as a matter of fact), I need to average at least 1,500 words per day to reach my goal of having the first draft finished before the beginning of October. With a due date of December 1—which really means I have to get it turned in before I leave for Hot Springs for Thanksgiving—the month of October will be a vital time for me to be able to have people read RC to give me feedback. (And no, that’s not a call for volunteers. I already have my readers lined up.) Because of the nature of writing a historical novel, feedback is vital. I have to make sure I’m not over- or under-explaining things—especially since this book takes place in large part aboard ship. Because it’s the second book of a story that takes place over three books, I have to make sure that it gives a full, satisfying story while making the reader yearn to read the third book. And I have to make sure all of my research is accurate and that I’ve filled any holes that I didn’t research while writing the book.
So how am I getting started with this project?
Well, my first step, I’ve already started—which is re-reading Ransome’s Honor. Yes, I’m actually reading the printed book. I’ve also made a calendar/list of events that need to happen in the beginning of the book while they’re still in Portsmouth, before they set sail. But before I start writing, I need to figure out where I’m starting this story. Do I pick up the moment that the first book leaves off? The next day? A few days later? I only have them in Portsmouth about seven days before the ships leave, so I can’t have too much of a time gap. Then, once I do start writing, how much backstory do I include? Do I write it assuming that the reader has read the first book? Do I try to make it a stand-alone and pretend like I didn’t write the first book and just pretend like I’m starting a brand-new story with this one? And do I need to spend more time plotting this one out to make sure once I get started that I’m going to have enough story to fill 105,000 words?
Don’t get me wrong, I’m excited about delving back into the Regency world, especially since there’s more opportunity for some action scenes and to really explore the workings of the Royal Navy as well as delve deeper into certain relationships from the first book. But it’s also a daunting thing to realize that in less than five months, I have another book manuscript due—one that takes a whole lot more work than just writing the story and revising it to make sure it works (okay, yes, there is research that has gone into all three of the contemporary novels—but nothing like what goes into the historical). And I already know there are going to be a lot of distractions while I’m trying to get it written: going to Atlanta next week to speak at a booksellers’ conference, ICRS the week after that, a few book signings I’m already talking to people about. Teaching at MTCW every month, interviews and marketing, spending time with friends, the ACFW conference in September (if I can afford to go), working on the edits I get back from Barbour on Case, football season starting in September, and…what am I forgetting? Oh yeah, let’s not forget, the freelance work I need to be doing every week to be able to support myself without taking a full-time job so I can have the time to write.
Can you tell I’m stressing myself out needlessly before really even getting started on the next book? Which is why I’m taking the holiday weekend to do things like go around to the bookstores, Wal-Marts, and Sam’s stores around down to see who has MFR and RH out like they’re supposed to. Packing up books to take to the post office to mail out to contest winners. And watching movies. Over the next three or four days, I plan to watch all eight of the Hornblower movies, every single Austen adaptation I own (which includes all of the old BBC adaptations from the ’70s and ’80s), and Master and Commander. (Okay, no, I really don’t have time in four days to watch all of those movies, but I’ll do my best!) I’m going to pull out all of my research notes and start reviewing them. I may even pull out a couple of my favorite research books and start flipping through all of the Post-it Note marked pages. And I’m going to try to get back on a more regular sleep schedule. This staying up until three or four in the morning and then sleeping until eleven or twelve may have worked for cramming to get the book finished, but I must get myself back on a normal work-write-play schedule so that when I do have plans—such as the Saturday MTCW meetings every other week—I’m not having to set four alarms just to make sure I get up in time to go and then drag through the rest of the day. Plus, if I’m going to start walking again and take off this five or six pounds I’ve gained this month from eating take-out and fast-food while finishing Case, it’s better to do it earlier in the morning before it gets too hot outside.
So that’s what’s next for me.
Comments are closed.

I love hearing about the daily grind. I really enjoy seeing how things are going and how you plan your time out. Hey, sounds like fun watching all those movies for research!
BTW, I’m reviewing your articles on POV, but wouldn’t mind hearing more on deep POV. If the story isn’t so much a suspense story is it still effective? I do not want to write in the first person, but would like to have a similar effect. Or is that affect? :p
LikeLike
Carla–
Yes, deep POV is effective in ANY genre, not just suspense. Because there needs to be a certain level of tension (i.e., suspense) in every genre, because that’s what keeps the reader reading. Another series you might want to read through is the Hooking the Reader series.
LikeLike
Wow…if you watched all 8 Hornblower films, ALL of your Austen adaptations, and Master & Commander, I’m pretty sure that’s more than 4 days worth of viewing! Or else that’s all that a person could do, watch TV without ever getting up!! LOL! I’m looking forward to reading RC (but don’t stress on my account!! *wink*).
LikeLike
I’ll probably just cherry pick them—I really only want to watch the last four Hornblowers, and probably won’t watch the new version of Persuasion nor the Emma Thompson version of S&S, nor the ’95 version of P&P (I’ve seen it so many times in recent years compared to the ’81 version). So, I definitely won’t watch ALL of them.
LikeLike
Geez, I’m tired now!
LikeLike
Welcome to my world! 🙂
LikeLike
That’s the same problem I’m having with my sequel. Do I give a bunch of backstory or assume that the reader has read the first? I settled for a paragraph of backstory. For now. I may change that.
Congratulations on finishing your book! Yaaay!
Oh, and I joined ACFW. I am sooo excited. 😉
LikeLike
I think what I’m going to have to do is just write it without worrying about backstory—as if I’m just continuing the first novel, and then when I go back for revisions figure it out then.
LikeLike
I would say narrow it down to your favorite Hornblower films if you can, then choose the Austen films that you have never watched to view first.
Back when you did a comparison between S&S95 and S&S07 you said that you had never seen S&S81. Do watch it by all means. I actually think I like it a little better than the other two. The two things I don’t like are that there is no Margaret and I just can’t warm up to Col. Brandon. Marianne is the best out of all the versions imo. Tracy Childs was seventeen when she played the part and acted like a seventeen year old. Everything is so dramatic and when she cries she just sobs. Charity Wakefield didn’t cry enough. Kate Winslet cried enough,but everything was so seriously dramatic with her and everyone else in the story. With Tracy Childs you get the impression that she thought her behavior was serious, but everyone else saw right through it and thought she was being a little over the top like most teenagers. She and Elinor act like sisters too. Edward is great (if you can get past his hair)and Lucy, Robert, Fanny, John, etc., are spot on. Oh, and Charlotte Palmer is wonderful. They cast a younger woman for her, who is the correct age, and that makes all the difference. She laughs alot like she’s supposed to, but it makes sense when you think of her age. I’ve met people like that before. With Imelda Staunton it was almost embarrassing because of her age and with the baby and all. OK. I need to stop rambling.
LikeLike
The ’81 version of S&S is one of those I do plan on watching, since I’ve never seen it. As a matter of fact, it’s the only one of that set I’ve never watched, so it’s about time!
LikeLike
” the freelance work I need to be doing every week…”
Does that mean you’re doing critiquing again?
LikeLike
Right now, for publishing houses only. I have a couple of them that are keeping me pretty well supplied with freelance work.
LikeLike