The more I’ve thought about it, the more I’ve come to the conclusion that S&S was the first Andrew Davies historical I’ve seen where I feel disappointed in his script.

I also loved the scene of Elinor mourning the revelation about Edward’s engagement in the cave – I thought that moment was beautifully and powerfully rendered.

The new Palmers were a huge disappointment – but as you say, who could possibly beat Hugh Laurie and Imelda Staunton?! Their role in the new adaptation was so truncated it felt really unnecessary.

I also agree with you about the duel scene – I wish the lead-up to that scene had been more fully explained/explored. This would’ve been especially nice given the little added scene of Brandon visiting Eliza. Why add such a scene if you’re not going to explain that Brandon was going after Willoughby in the duel because of Eliza?! Hmmm…wonder if Davies wanted to subliminally suggest that the duel was really over W.’s treatment of Marianne, because he thought that would be more compelling or something…

I thought Jean Marsh was absolutely inspired in her portrayal of Mrs. Ferrars. I also liked the fact that Anne Steele was included in this version.

Absolutely second your opinion on the whole hawk/horse training thing. What the heck was up with that?! *bangs head on keyboard in frustration*

Also completely agree with you on Northanger Abbey being the “winner” of the season. It was new and fresh and fun, and didn’t feel like a rehash or an expanded version of anything I’d seen before. (I also thought it was very weird that Sally Hawkins was used in so many of the promo banners, etc., to advertise The Complete Jane Austen.)

I’m really looking forward to A Room With a View! And Cranford in May…that should be fabulous (*fingers crossed*).